Skip to Main Content

Systematic reviews, scoping reviews and other evidence syntheses

Overview of evidence synthesis reviews and relevant strategies, tools and resources.

What is evidence synthesis?

Evidence synthesis:

  • also called knowledge synthesis
  • uses reproducible and transparent methods to analyze data from multiple primary studies
  • refers to evidence that has been:
    • synthesized from a large set of data/studies
    • summarized
    • critically appraised
  • synthesized evidence is considered:
    • less biased
    • more rigorous
    • more generalizable

Image: https://libguides.lib.umanitoba.ca/c.php?g=297452&p=4467117

Why do we need evidence synthesis?

  • Combining and appraising information from multiple studies:
    • helps ensure clinicians use the most appropriate treatment/medication
    • provides evidence-based information to guide health policy and programming
    • reduces unnecessary repetition of research studies

Steps in evidence synthesis

Evidence synthesis generally involves these steps: undefined

  • Stating the objectives of the research
  • Defining eligibility criteria for studies to be included and excluded
  • Identifying (all) potentially eligible studies
  • Screening for inclusion and exclusion
  • Extracting data from the final set of screened studies
  • Appraising the final set of studies
  • Applying statistical analysis, if applicable
  • Preparing a structured report of the research

Reference: CIHR. (n.d.) A knowledge synthesis chapter: Stages of knowledge synthesis

Image: Ayala, P. (2020). Screening for studies in systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other knowledge syntheses: Strategies for improvement. KSIG webinar, April 2020.


For more information and guidance on evidence synthesis, including disciplines outside health sciences, please see materials from the University of Minnesota's Evidence Synthesis Institute

 

 

Types of evidence synthesis reviews

  • There are multiple types of synthesis reviews
  • It's important to:
    • select the appropriate review method for your research question
    • be transparent and clear about your aims, methods, and reporting
  • This diagram from Yale Library illustrates some of the questions to consider when deciding on a review type:

 

 

References:

Centre for Research Evaluation, London School Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. (n.d.) Evidence synthesis: synthesis methods.

Sutton, A., Clowes, M., Preston, L., & Booth, A. (2019). Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Information & Libraries Journal, (3), 202. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276